Crossposted with revision from European Tribune and My Left Wing.
Quick, name this sport: rival world champions, a shady multi-millionaire commissioner, drug testing, boycotts, and shapely young women parading around in skimpy costumes. If you said professional wrestling, you get partial credit. The correct answer, of course, is chess.
Lev Grossman
“Chess is everything: art, science and sport,” said Anatoly Karpov. During the Cold War, it was also world politics, but those glory days have passed. Although chess is flourishing on the Internet and spreading like wildfire on the Asian continent, where it once originated, the sports dimension of the game is going through some trying times. Argues Daniel Johnson in Prospect Magazine:
The rise and fall of chess in the 20th century was intimately linked with the cold war and the Soviet Union’s giant investment in the game. But deprived of the atmosphere of menace that characterised that era, chess has dissipated much of the capital it built up over more than a century.
As a spectator sport, it cannot satisfy a public accustomed to fast, intellectually undemanding entertainment. Artificial constraints on global competition have been abolished, but Fide, the game’s international organisation, is a shambles, controlled and subsidised by Kirsan Ilyumzhinov, the dictator of a tiny Russian province called Kalmykia. Ilyumzhinov’s only other claim to fame is that he was a close associate of Saddam Hussein and on the last plane out of Baghdad before the coalition invaded.

A Yeltsin-era instant billionaire, Ilyumzhinov enjoys appearing in Ghengis Khan-style attire on his white Arab horses; having bothersome journalists disposed of; and being quoted like this: “In my country, there is only one man who plays politics, and that is me. The other men have to work, the women have to bear children, and the children have to play chess.” The extravagant ‘chess city’ he had built in the capital Elista – just what the impoverished nomads of Kalmykia always wanted – is now crumbling, but no worry: Kirsan has announced the creation of a
$2,6 billion ‘international chess city’ in Dubai, to serve as the new FIDE headquarters and host 60 million players annually.
Meanwhile, last year saw Garry Kasparov, larger-than-life personality and probably the strongest player in history, retire from the king-hunting business to rather take on a President, namely Ilyumzhinov’s patron, “the dictator Vladimir Putin.” (Listen to an interview with ABC: Windows Media Player; Real Audio Player.) The sport’s only other global icon is exiled on Iceland, barking mad. And as if this weren’t enough, the mystique of the chess Grandmaster is being challenged in the public mind by number-crunching contraptions.
The monsters are coming
Meet a talented young machine called Hydra:
[The programmer Ulf] Lorenz claims Hydra is now the strongest chess-playing entity in the world. “We think we have crossed the 3,000 ELO line,” he says. ELO measures the strength of chess players; Kasparov, at his strongest, would have been just above 2,800, so to reach 3,000 is like cutting 20 seconds from the world record for the 1500 metres. No human player could compete with that.
“Once it was thought that humans played almost perfect chess,” says Lorenz. “Grandmasters were seen as perfect and it was said that no one could ever play ELO 3,000 because there’s a limit. Now we see this is wrong. It was also said a grandmaster would always be able to get at least a draw by keeping control of the game. That has been proved wrong, too.”
In November, the (unsurprisingly) Dubai-based Hydra joined two of its kind to mop the floor with three former world champions in the annual Man vs. Machine exhibition match in Spain, which ended 8-4. The one game won by an organism had GM Ruslan Ponomariov blundering a pawn by forgetting, no less, the en passant rule (how’s that for human error?). In a strange fluke, however, his opponent – perhaps busy pondering whether meat can be sentient – suddenly threw the game.
Not that it takes 3,000-rated supercomputers to make mincemeat of the strongest gray matter. The 10th edition of Ubi Soft’s popular Chessmaster, which runs in the background as I write, features a 2002 online exhibition match in which its immediate predecessor scalps the then US Champion, GM Larry Christiansen, while by turns imitating three other previous world champs – Alexander Alekhine, Bobby Fischer, and Mikhail Botvinnik (who said machines are short on personality?). It is not known whether the hardware also balanced itself on one corner, juggling balls.
OK, we get it: the silicon stuff beats the natural, at least in this department. But then, who made the silicon? As John Searle, the famous philosopher of mind, remarked upon Kasparov’s deep blue day in 1997 (full report here), if the machinery in question were built by Martians or chimpanzees, then we might be in for some competition. As far as known, the IBM team didn’t include any chess proficient Martians; and as to chimpanzees, one must agree with Edward Lasker: “It has been said that man is distinguished from animal in that he buys more books than he can read. I should like to suggest that the inclusion of a few chess books would help to make the distinction unmistakable.” (The Adventure of Chess, 1949.)
In fact, as IM Eric Schiller pointed out to me: “The computer programs have extensive opening strategies which are 100% human-designed. Without these “opening books” the machines play terribly…. No computer unaided by a human-crafted opening book has ever defeated an accomplished chessplayer.”
Anyhow, for those still concerned about the pride of humankind, there remains the 4,000 year old game which Lasker helped introduce to the West: Go. It has been said that Go stands to chess as philosophy to double entry book-keeping, and though the rules are simple enough for a 3 year old to learn, the play emerging from those rules is too complex for a computer to best even a middling human.
Magnificent Magnus
There’s something special about prodigies that brute machines and mad dictators lack. At the moment, my country is seized by a modest chess fever on account of Magnus Carlsen, “the Mozart of Chess.” At 13 – about the time his biography appeared - he became the world’s youngest Grandmaster, the second youngest ever. By then the fearless attacker had drawn with Kasparov and defeated the likes of Alexei Shirov and Anatoly Karpov. Days after turning 15 on November 30 2005, Carlsen became the youngest ever World Championship candidate by sensationally finishing 10th in the FIDE World Cup. Neither Kasparov nor Fischer got that far until later in their careers. Can Magnus make it to the final? And could he be the new charismatic attraction the chess sport needs?
The boy wonder and the tyrant tycoon: Magnus and Kirsan in the FIDE World Cup.
While waiting for those answers, let’s treat ourselves to some belated New Year’s fireworks. Below are three brilliant wins by Carlsen, the last one against former prodigy Gata Kamsky, who lost the FIDE World Championship finale to Karpov in 1996.
The notation used is
English algebraic. To review the games in a graphic format, download
Winboard 4.2.7 (for Windows) or
Xboard 4.2.7 (for Unix).
1. [Event “Corus Chess Tournament: B Group”]
[Site “Wijk aan Zee NED”]
[Date “2005.01.28″]
[Round “11″]
[White “M Carlsen”]
[Black “Pr Nikolic”]
[Result “1-0″]
[WhiteElo “2553″]
[BlackElo “2676″]
[EventDate “2005.01.15″]
[ECO “C08″]
[PlyCount “44″]
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 c5 4. exd5 exd5 5. Ngf3 c4 6. b3 cxb3 7. axb3 Bb4 8. Ne5 Ne7 9. Bd3 Nbc6 10. O-O Bc3 11. Ra4 Bxd4 12. Nxc6 Nxc6 13. Ba3 Be6 14. Nf3 Bb6 15. Qa1 Qc7 16. b4 f6 17. Re1 Kf7 18. b5 Na5 19. Qd1 Rae8 20. Ng5+ fxg5 21. Qf3+ Kg8 22. Rxe6 1-0
2. [Event “WCC 2005″]
[Site “0:06.39-0:10.09″]
[Date “2005.12.14″]
[Round “64″]
[White “Carlsen, Magnus”]
[Black “Malakhov, Vladimir”]
[Result “1-0″]
[WhiteElo “2570″]
[BlackElo “2670″]
[WhiteCountry “NOR”]
[BlackCountry “RUS”]
[Remark “WCC 2005 Match 005″]
[PresId “1000640005″]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 a6 5. e3 g6 6. Be2 Bg7 7. O-O O-O 8. Qb3 dxc4 9. Bxc4 b5 10. Be2 Nbd7 11. e4 Nb6 12. Bf4 Be6 13. Qc2 Bc4 14. Rfd1 Rc8 15. Rac1 Bxe2 16. Qxe2 Qd7 17. h3 Qb7 18. Bg5 Rfe8 19. e5 Nfd5 20. Ne4 Nd7 21. Qd2 Qb8 22. Bh6 Bh8 23. h4 Nf8 24. Nc5 Qa7 25. h5 Nc7 26. hxg6 hxg6 27. Bxf8 Rxf8 28. Qh6 Bg7 29. Qh4 f6 30. Qg4 Kh7 31. Nh4 g5 32. Qh5+ Kg8 33. Nf5 Ne8 34. Qg6 1-0
3. [Event “WCC Places 9-10″]
[Site “Khanty Mansyisk RUS”]
[Date “2005.12.15″]
[Round “7.1″]
[White “Carlsen, M.”]
[Black “Kamsky, G.”]
[Result “1-0″]
[WhiteElo “2570″]
[BlackElo “2690″]
[ECO “B43″]
[PlyCount “95″]
[EventDate “2005.11.27″]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 a6 5. Nc3 Qc7 6. Bd3 b5 7. O-O Bb7 8. Qe2 Ne7 9. Re1 Nbc6 10. Nxc6 Nxc6 11. Nd5 exd5 12. exd5+ Ne7 13. c4 b4 14. Bg5 f6 15. Qh5+ g6 16. Qf3 fxg5 17. Qf6 O-O-O 18. Qxh8 Qd6 19. Be4 Kb8 20. Rac1 Qf4 21. g3 Qf7 22. Qd4 d6 23. Qb6 Rd7 24. Qxb4 Nf5 25. Bxf5 gxf5 26. Re6 f4 27. Rce1 Rd8 28. Qb6 Rc8 29. b4 fxg3 30. hxg3 h5 31. b5 Qc7 32. Qxc7+ Kxc7 33. a4 axb5 34. axb5 Kb6 35. Re8 Bg7 36. R8e6 Rd8 37. c5+ Kxc5 38. Re7 Bd4 39. Rxb7 Rf8 40. Rc7+ Kxd5 41. Rd1 Rb8 42. Rg7 g4 43. Rg5+ Kc4 44. Rxh5 Bc5 45. Rg5 Rxb5 46. Rxg4+ Kc3 47. Kg2 Ba3 48. Rgd4 1-0
If you’re ready for more extraordinary games, check out this annotated one between none other than God and the Devil - undeniably preferable, I submit, to betting on poor Job.
Inspired to play, but rusty on the rules? Try this amusing tutorial.
Humphrey Bogart and Peter Lorre on the set of ‘Casablanca.’