August 10, 2006

Preventive peace

Filed under: US, Europe, Terrorism

So British police has foiled a major international terrorist plot.

Said plot aimed to blow up as much as ten commercial airliners en route from the UK to the US. Most of the around 21 suspects are British born Muslims. Not Saudi born. British born.

Does this ring a bell? The Iraq War and other misadventures of the War on Terror ™ are not merely irrelevant to the objective of quelling the international jihadi Salafist movement: they positively boost the latter. In particular they give rise to terrorism against the countries leading this perceived “War on the Ummah,” the terrorists frequently being alienated Muslim citizens of same.

For a while now, we have been reassured that al-Qaeda is finished off as a command-and-control structure, persisting solely on a “franchise” basis. The fresh mega-operation is the latest sign that the reality may be more complex. Last month I quoted one Bruce Hoffman at the Rand Corporation (not a hotbed of leftist pacifism) to the effect that a reassessment may be in order. Let’s have a fuller excerpt of that WaPo article:

Conventional wisdom — and the Bush administration — holds that the United States’ attack on Afghanistan dislodged and weakened the al-Qaida terrorist organization.

It’s back, a top terrorism expert told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Tuesday.

“Today, al-Qaida has not only regrouped, but it is on the march,” said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at the Rand Corp. “Al-Qaida is now functioning exactly as its founder and leader, Osama bin Laden, envisioned it.”

[snip]

The Rand Corp.’s counterterrorism office has been studying captured al-Qaida literature and speeches over the last year — the so-called Harmony documents seized in Afghanistan and dating back to the mid-1980s — and has arrived at a very different conclusion.

“Today, al-Qaida is also frequently spoken of as it if is in retreat: a broken and beaten organization incapable of mounting further attacks on its own and instead having devolved operational authority either to its carious affiliates and associated or to entirely organically produced, homegrown, terrorist entities. Nothing could be further from the truth,” Hoffman told the committee.

The Afghan attack “pulverized” al-Qaida, Hoffman told United Press International Wednesday.

“I think we did do that, but this is a movement with enormous regenerative capacity — its message resonates, and it’s not wanting for volunteers,” Hoffman said. “They’ve adapted and adjusted to even our most consequential countermeasures.”

In the ensuing four years since the attack, the organization has evolved into what bin Laden set out to create: a fractured, worldwide movement inspired by bin Laden and united by a single vision, as well as a central organization that continues to direct the implementation of terrorist attacks.

“To the idea al-Qaida is on the run — how can that be if al-Qaida was directly responsible for the most consequential terrorist incident of the last year? (The London bombings) was not Sept. 11 but it was still a very significant attack,” Hoffman said. “It’s wishful thinking.”

Moreover, it was carried out by an al-Qaida cell British intelligence — one of the best counter-terrorist forces in the world — knew nothing about.

Predictably, Bush called the plot a “stark reminder that this nation [the USA] is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom.” But pace Chimpoleon, when such ploys are actually foiled in time, it’s due to police work, not preventive war.

In the aforementioned post from July I also quoted a certain Osama bin Laden’s own account of the formative experiences leading him to find his vocation. This, too, is worth a rerun:

The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced.

I couldn’t forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.

The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn’t include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn’t respond.

In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.

And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.

And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.

I ask again: how many jihadi mass murderers will go into business after the unholy trinity of Bush, Blair, and Olmert are done grinding Lebanon back to dust? Could something possibly be learned from history over and above the hackneyed mantra of “Münich 1938″?

5 Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://sirocco.blogsome.com/2006/08/10/preventive-peace/trackback/

  1. Extremely interesting article and I wish we would see this sort of analysis in the main papers more often…
    Unfortunately, it seems that our ‘leaders’ have decided that the world needed a major war again and we are going straight into that. It is already unpatriotic to criticise.

    Comment by Shyamal — August 11, 2006 @ 11:27 am

  2. I have to confess your blog is the best I have seen thus far. I often feel guilty reading blogs (consider it a waste of time) except today bumping into yours. Hilsen.

    Comment by a citizen of the world — August 11, 2006 @ 1:39 pm

  3. Thanks much guys.

    Comment by Sirocco — August 11, 2006 @ 2:05 pm

  4. Some Israelis Criticizing War in Lebanon

    By ARTHUR MAX
    Associated Press Writer

    TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — The first cracks in Israeli support for the war in Lebanon emerged Thursday, with leading intellectuals and mainstream politicians criticizing the government’s decision to send more soldiers into Hezbollah territory.

    Link

    Comment by Gal — August 11, 2006 @ 4:51 pm

  5. Amazing, I have never realized that Osamah bin Laden is such a humanist. He has hated the americans after 1982 so much, that he didn’t go to Lebanon to fight Israel and it’s american masters but used US support to fight against the USSR. Please tell me could it be, just maybe, that terroism against the US, UK, India, Spain, Russia and dare I say it, Israel and other places in the world is not due to some action of the west but is an inherent characteristic of islamic fundamentalism?? Please remind me what came first 9/11 or the US occupation of Afganistahn and Iraq? jewish armed forces (Hagana, Etzel, Lehi) or arab terroism against jews in mandatorial palestine?

    Comment by Shmulik — August 12, 2006 @ 12:04 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

Banner based on template designed by Nao