July 30, 2006

How Israel created Hizbollah

An op-ed by the Norwegian novelist Torgrim Eggen, readworthy especially for its historical point of view.


The world’s worst neighbor

Now they are bombing Beirut again. That’s what it’s like to have the world’s worst neighbor.

Torgrim Eggen, Bergens Tidende, 29.07.06

From the Norwegian by Sirocco

THE INTERNET is quite a tool. I am sitting here with Google Earth looking at satellite images of Beirut. I think I have found Khraibeh Street, where I lived in the fall of 1993.
     Khraibeh Street is situated in the hillside in Hadeth east of the airport, and from my roof terrace adorned with pictoresque bullet holes I enjoyed a panorama view of western Beirut. Nearest was the ghetto Hay al-Sellum, which US Marines called “Hooterville” when they served as a peacekeeping force in Beirut from 1982 to 1984. Hay al-Sellum is Hizbollahstan. The area was dangerous, claimed my Christian hosts, so when we ventured there it was on the condition that I was “Swiss.” This, of course, was thanks to the Oslo Accords.

NORTH OF “Hooterville,” in good view of my terrace, was the Palestinian refugee camp of Bourj al-Barajneh. Or rather, what was left of it. North-west of this, in turn, are Sabra and Shatila, the scene of perhaps the blackest chapter of Israeli and Lebanese history.
     I recall people asking: — What are you doing in Beirut day after day? Why don’t you head up to see the Roman ruins at Baalbek, or the ruins of Byblos? My reply: — Don’t you think I see enough ruins from the terrace? There was, as it were, nothing else.

AND NOW THEY are at it bombing Beirut again. What wrong have these people done?
     It would be unfair to blame all of Lebanon’s misery on its southern neighbor. Let us say Israel is merely responsible for ninety percent. It is shocking what brutality the Israelis display when Lebanon is the target. The current Chief of Staff is Dan Halutz, and the acts of war had barely begun when he declared that they would “bomb Lebanon 20 years back in time.” This week he reportedly said that Israel “will bomb ten housing blocks in Beirut for every missile hitting Haifa.” To avoid the commonplace accusations of “anti-Semitism” I shall not mention what this is reminiscent of. According to the Jerusalem Post, Halutz was misquoted. In any case, this is a man who is staying the course toward the Hague. His former boss Ariel Sharon, now in coma, should have been charged there as well.

IN THE WAR OF 1982, Israel managed to commit just about every war crime in the book. Bombing of hospitals. Terror bombing of residential quarters. Use of phosphorous and cluster bombs against civilians. Summary executions of prisoners. You name it. Israel was even able to bomb Beirut’s sole remaining synagogue. All this and more can be read in Pity the Nation: Lebanon and War by Robert Fisk, hereby recommended. This is the book that will make you laugh out loud the next time you hear the term ’surgical strikes’.

SO WHY dwell at length on a war 24 years past? Because that was when Israel invented Hizbollah. It was an accomplishment making the expression ‘to shoot oneself in the leg’ sound tame.
     When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1978 and 1982 to weed out the PLO, the poor Shia minority in southern Lebanon were relatively impartial. The conflict lacked the religous resonances it has today, and besides, the majority of the PLO, Fatah, et cetera were Sunnis. The problem was that the Shias were in the way. The savagery and brutality with which Israel proceeded, first against southern villages and then against the quarters of Beirut to which the villagers fled (those who weren’t mowed down by Israeli aircraft underway), led to radicalization. The Shias became militant, and there was inspiration (as well as finances) on offer in Iran.
     On November 11 1982 it said boom. Israel’s military headquarters in Tyre went up in smoke; 75 Israelis died. A previously unknown group that called itself Islamic Jihad took responsibility for what was in fact the first suicide operation in the Middle East. Islamic Jihad is believed to have been a branch of “the Party of God.”

CAN I TEMPT with an interesting moral dilemma? A “terrorist organization” stations a SAM site on a hospital roof in violation of the Geneva Conventions. A martial power bombs the hospital and kills everyone inside — doctors, nurses, and civilian patients. Is it possible to talk about ‘degrees’ of responsibility here? I think it is. The “terrorists” put civilian lives in danger. The martial power executes them. Much of today’s Lebanon conflict is about such things, about “living shields” and “collateral damage.”
     The above example is once again from Israel’s invasion in 1982. To be fair, they also bombed hospitals on which the “terrorists” had stationed nothing whatsoever. At Bourj al-Barajneh it appeared that the Israeli pilot had used the Red Cross-symbol on the roof to aim. After all, there could be “terrorists” in the hospital beds. This year it seems that shooting at ambulances is the sport in vogue. Or was it UN observers?

ISRAEL’S FORMER Prime Minister Menachem Begin once declared that “if Adolf Hitler were hiding in a housing block full of civilians, we would bomb it.” Now, there wasn’t any Israel at the time when Hitler frequented housing blocks. That is at the core of the problem, so to speak. Back when PLO was the main enemy, it was passable in the Israeli public sphere to compare Yassir Arafat to Hitler. This year the Hizbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah has the honor of being “Hitler.”
     But in that case it would surely suffice to bomb one house? As opposed to reducing a city of millions to rubble?
     This is where the Israeli logic fails, and it does so because it is the logic of terrorism. The logic of terrorism dictates that a hospital is a legitimate target if it may contain combatants.
     The logic is so bizarre that it values the life of one terrorist higher than other lives — if one kills twenty innocents to eliminate one Hizbollah stalwart, the operation is a success.
     Yes, I think Israel must have the right to exist and defend itself. I even find the idea of a “security zone” a good one. But then, in the name of decency, it should surely be located in Israel and not in Lebanon. After all, you don’t empty your garbage bin over the fence to your neighbor, right?

By Torgrim Eggen 2006. Translation by Sirocco.

Israel is losing badly

Filed under: Middle East

Like all modern wars, this one is being waged on a moral as well as a military front. Israel is losing on both. Its international image depends on a David vs. Goliath frame, which has two elements: 1. Goliath is nasty, brutish, and tall; 2. David kicks him around against all odds. Israel is supposed to be David — as in 1948, 1967, 1973. Instead it now comes across as Goliath being held to a tie by David in spite of savagely terrorizing his wife and children. If the war were to end today, it would be an unmitigated political disaster for Israel.

But what to do? As its generals ought to know, air power alone has never destroyed an army, nor induced a civilian population to surrender. Thus, for Israel to avoid total strategic disaster, it will have to invade southern Lebanon. But this is what Hizbollah has spent six years preparing for. Furthermore, Israel has destroyed the communications infrastructure, which puts a lightly armed, mobile and already deployed guerrilla at an advantage. Finally, the human toll of invasion would inevitably further undermine support for Israel, even in the only demographic and government it cares about.

I don’t see any way out of this for the Israeli government.

Oops! …we did it again

Filed under: Middle East, Terrorism

More photos here.

So the noble, knightly warriors of the IDF carry out another massacre in Qana, killing at least 40 60 civilians including at least 23 37 children. Israel’s belated answer to Curtis LeMay assures us it was a regrettable accident:

JERUSALEM, July 30 (Reuters) - Israel’s army was unaware civilians were sheltering in a building in the southern Lebanese village of Qana that was heavily bombed on Sunday, the military chief said.

“We did not know of the whereabouts of civilians in the village,” Lieutenant-General Dan Halutz was quoted by the NRG Maariv Web site as telling President Moshe Katsav.

Sure, maybe. Or maybe not:

A high-ranking IAF officer caused a storm on Monday in an off-record briefing during which he told reporters that IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Dan Halutz had ordered the military to destroy 10 buildings in Beirut in retaliation to every Katyusha rocket strike on Haifa.

And why, after all, should reprisals be confined to Beirut, when according to the Israeli government, “[a]ll those now in south Lebanon are terrorists who are related in some way to Hezbollah”?

Time for a brief recap of just a few previous “slips” that come to mind:

1967. IDF conducts sustained air and naval attack at the USS Liberty flying US flag in int’l waters after 8 hours of aireal surveillance, killing 34 — accidental

1982. IDF allows massacre by ally in Lebanon refugee camps, killing 7-800 — accidental

1996. IDF massacre at UNIFIL compound at Qana, killing 106 refugees while two helicopters and drone are present — accidental

2003. IDF kills American activist Rachel Corrie with bulldozer — accidental

2006. IDF shells to death family on the beach in Gaza — accidental

2006. IDF attacks several Red Cross ambulances — accidental

2006. IDF shells UNIFIL compound over six hours, killing four — accidental

2006. IDF shells other UNIFIL compound, wounding two — accidental

2006. IDF attacks several press convoys — accidental

2006. IDF bombs several hospitals — accidental

2006. IDF attacks numerous refugee convoys — accidental

Surely this must be one of the world’s most incompetent militaries. Can it really be entrusted with more than 200 nuclear weapons?

Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here

Banner based on template designed by Nao